3-21-12 Replacing Iraq war with Iran war? |
![]() |
By Debra Sweet We've been out on the streets over the last week talking to people about the wars begun under the Bush regime, which are now fully Obama's wars, and how they remain illegitimate, unjust, immoral. And how the only force authoritative force to stop them is us, forming ourselves into a much larger, louder, more determined movement. IRAQ: Large numbers of people said to us, "Iraq is over," a statement more true than most of them realized. While Iraq is still occupied, it's been left in the hands of modern warlords who are further destroying the country, leaving people without essential services and in constant insecurity, because of the aggressive war begun by the U.S. Oil is flowing out of Iraq to the rich countries, but the widows, orphans, injured and bereaved are much worse off than they were before US sanctions began in 1990, and Shock & Awe in 2003. New videos: The MIT Center for International Studies has an excellent page called The Human Cost of the War in Iraq to "present empirical reports, studies, and other accounts that convey and assess the consequences of war for the people of Iraq." AFGHANISTAN: Only Al Jazeera printed the names of the 16 civilians killed last week near Kandahar, although U.S. newspapers have gone on extensively about Robert Bales, who the military says was the sole killer. 200 protested the wars Sunday in the Pakistani community of Chicago, right. Photo by FJJ.
The dead: Glen Greenwald, in Hypocrisies and Ironies in American Justice writes that Robert Bales is now likely in the same unit with Bradley Manning at Ft. Leavenworth: That likely means that there will be some substantial interaction between Bales and Manning. Think about that: if you expose to the world previously unknown evidence of widespread wanton killing of civilians (as Manning allegedly did), then you will end up in the same place as someone who actually engages in the mass wanton killing of civilians (as Bales allegedly did), except that the one who committed atrocities will receive better treatment than the one who exposed them. That’s a nice reflection of our government’s value system (similar to the way that high government officials who commit egregious crimes are immunized, while those who expose them are aggressively prosecuted). If the chat logs are to be believed, Manning decided to leak those documents because they revealed heinous war crimes that he could no longer in good conscience allow to be concealed, and he will now find himself next to a soldier who is accused of committing heinous war crimes. IRAN: The New York Times reported the the U.S. military carried out war games with the purpose of determining the effect of missile strikes on Iran. Friday, antiwar.com reported "Netanyahu Moves Closer to Iran Attack." Haaretz reports "Netanyahu is preparing Israeli public opinion for a war on Iran," and Obama says "Window for diplomatic solution to Iran nuclear standoff is 'shrinking.'" Clearly this is an urgent situation -- a loud and clear rejection of war is needed to help mobilize opposition to war in the US. Hundreds at the Left Forum supported this message: NO WAR ON IRAN! Even if Iran possessed nuclear weapons, a U.S.-Israeli attack would constitute illegal, unjust, and immoral aggression. Such a war would not rid the Middle East of nuclear weapons. Such a war would not end oppression or liberate the Iranian people. And the toll in Iran and beyond would likely be enormous – the Union of Concerned Scientists warns a “bunker-buster” bomb dropped on an Iranian reactor “would create massive clouds of radioactive fallout that could spread far” and “the number of casualties could range up to more than a hundred thousand.” So we demand: End these threats! Lift economic sanctions! No U.S. or Israeli attack on Iran! More analysis on Iran from Larry Everest:
|